NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1150MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (80.19GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
1016 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
+11675%
2.355 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Jan 2016
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 900M
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
935 MHz
Base Clock
-
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
-
SM Count
1
1024
Shading Units
8
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
1024 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
Unknown
TDP
13W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Processor
GM206S
GPU Name
G98
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
UMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
