Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1350MHz vs 1150MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (402.4GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)
3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M
2.355 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64 +369%
11.06 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Jun 2017
GeForce 900M
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
1350 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
786 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
128bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
402.4GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
4096
64
TMUs
256
32
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
86.40 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
345.6 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
22.12 TFLOPS
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
11.06 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
691.2 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
250W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Vega 10
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 5.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy