Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 965M and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 965M 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 18% (1150MHz vs 975MHz)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 80.19GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 965M +17%
2.355 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2016
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce 900M
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
MXM-A (3.0)
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

935 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
1150 MHz
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
256bit
80.19GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
16
-
-
-
1024
Shading Units
1024
64
TMUs
64
32
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.80 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
73.60 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
-
-
-
2.355 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
73.60 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Board Design

Unknown
TDP
80W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM206S
GPU Name
Pitcairn
N16E-GR-A1
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 1.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
2.94 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
228 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy