Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs AMD FirePro W9100

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 vs AMD FirePro W9100

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980 and 16GB VRAM FirePro W9100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980 's Advantages
Released 6 months late
Boost Clock1216MHz
Lower TDP (165W vs 275W)
AMD FirePro W9100 's Advantages
More VRAM (16GB vs 4GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (320.0GB/s vs 224.4GB/s)
768 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 980
4.981 TFLOPS
FirePro W9100 +5%
5.238 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Sep 2014
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce 900
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1127 MHz
Base Clock
-
1216 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
256bit
Memory Bus
512bit
224.4GB/s
Bandwidth
320.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
44
-
-
-
2048
Shading Units
2816
128
TMUs
176
64
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
1024 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

77.82 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
59.52 GPixel/s
155.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
163.7 GTexel/s
-
-
-
4.981 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
5.238 TFLOPS
155.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
2.619 TFLOPS

Board Design

165W
TDP
275W
450 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
6x mini-DisplayPort 1.2 1x S-Video
2x 6-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
Hawaii
GM204-400-A1
GPU Variant
Hawaii GL44
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
GCN 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
28 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
6.2 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
438 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.2
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy