Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

NVIDIA GeForce GTX 980MX vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce GTX 980MX and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Max-Q Ada Generation 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 24% (1455MHz vs 1178MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 192.0GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (35W vs 148W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX 980MX
3.92 TFLOPS
RTX 2000 Max Q Ada Generation +128%
8.94 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jun 2016
Release Date
Mar 2023
GeForce 900M
Generation
Quadro Ada-M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1050 MHz
Base Clock
930 MHz
1178 MHz
Boost Clock
1455 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
256bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
256.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
-
SM Count
24
1664
Shading Units
3072
104
TMUs
96
64
ROPs
48
-
Tensor Cores
96
-
RT Cores
24
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
128 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
12 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

75.39 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
69.84 GPixel/s
122.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
139.7 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
8.940 TFLOPS
3.920 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
8.940 TFLOPS
122.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
139.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

148W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM204
GPU Name
AD107
N16E-GXX-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Ada Lovelace
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
5 nm
5.2 billion
Transistors
18.9 billion
398 mm²
Die Size
159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
5.2
CUDA
8.9
6.4
Shader Model
6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy