CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 12GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN X and 512MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 2 months late
Boost Clock1089MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.6GB/s vs 51.14GB/s)
3008 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition 's Advantages
Lower TDP (105W vs 250W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN X
+4081%
6.691 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
0.16 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN X
VS
GeForce 8800 GS Mac Edition
Graphics Card
Mar 2015
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 900
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
MXM-HE
Clock Speeds
1000 MHz
Base Clock
-
1089 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1753 MHz
Memory Clock
799 MHz
Memory
12GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.6GB/s
Bandwidth
51.14GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
8
-
Compute Units
-
3072
Shading Units
64
192
TMUs
32
96
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
-
3 MB
L2 Cache
64 KB
Theoretical Performance
104.5 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
8.000 GPixel/s
209.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
6.691 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
160.0 GFLOPS
209.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GM200
GPU Name
G92
GM200-400-A1
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell 2.0
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8 billion
Transistors
0.754 billion
601 mm²
Die Size
324 mm²
Board Design
250W
TDP
105W
600 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
5.2
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1080 Ti
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon HD 7670 OEM
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon HD 7350 OEM
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs ATI FirePro 2450 Multi View
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce G100 OEM
6
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon HD 6870 X2
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon HD 6230
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD Radeon HD 8550 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs AMD FirePro S7150
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN X vs NVIDIA GeForce 9800 GT Rebrand
Related News
1
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
2
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
3
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
4
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
5
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
6
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
7
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
8
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
9
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
10
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy