Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD FireStream 9250

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD FireStream 9250

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 1024MB VRAM FireStream 9250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 63.55GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
AMD FireStream 9250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (150W vs 375W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN Z +404%
5.046 TFLOPS
FireStream 9250
1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2014
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
FireStream
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

705 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
993 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.55GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
10
-
-
-
2880
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
-
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

375W
TDP
150W
750 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
1x DVI
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GK110B
GPU Name
RV770
GK110-350-B1
GPU Variant
RV770 PRO
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy