CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 320MB VRAM GeForce 8800 GTS 320 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 63.36GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 8800 GTS 320 's Advantages
Lower TDP (143W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
+2113%
5.046 TFLOPS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
0.228 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
VS
GeForce 8800 GTS 320
Graphics Card
May 2014
Release Date
Feb 2007
GeForce 700
Generation
GeForce 8
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 1.0 x16
Clock Speeds
705 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
792 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
320MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
320bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.36GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
12
-
Compute Units
-
2880
Shading Units
96
240
TMUs
24
48
ROPs
20
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
-
1536 KB
L2 Cache
80 KB
Theoretical Performance
52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.26 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.62 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
228.1 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
G80
GK110-350-B1
GPU Variant
G80-100-K0-A2
Kepler
Architecture
Tesla
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
90 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.681 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
484 mm²
Board Design
375W
TDP
143W
750 W
Suggested PSU
300 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1 (1.0)
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
1.0
5.1
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
3
AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD Radeon R7 265
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
6
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI All In Wonder HD 3650
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI Radeon HD 5570 OEM
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI Radeon HD 4570
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 SUPER
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy