CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce GTX TITAN Z and 512MB VRAM Radeon HD 4850 X2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z 's Advantages
Released 5 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock876MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 63.68GB/s)
2080 additional rendering cores
ATI Radeon HD 4850 X2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (250W vs 375W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
+404%
5.046 TFLOPS
Radeon HD 4850 X2
1 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX TITAN Z
VS
Radeon HD 4850 X2
Graphics Card
May 2014
Release Date
Nov 2008
GeForce 700
Generation
Radeon R700
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
705 MHz
Base Clock
-
876 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
995 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
384bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
63.68GB/s
Render Config
-
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
2880
Shading Units
800
240
TMUs
40
48
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
16 KB (per SMX)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1536 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
52.56 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.00 GPixel/s
210.2 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
25.00 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
-
5.046 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1000 GFLOPS
1.682 TFLOPS
FP64 (double)
200.0 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GK110B
GPU Name
R700
GK110-350-B1
GPU Variant
R700 PRO (215-0669065)
Kepler
Architecture
TeraScale
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
28 nm
Process Size
55 nm
7.08 billion
Transistors
0.956 billion
561 mm²
Die Size
256 mm²
Board Design
375W
TDP
250W
750 W
Suggested PSU
600 W
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
Outputs
4x DVI 1x S-Video
2x 8-pin
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
Graphics Features
12 (11_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.1
Vulkan
N/A
3.5
CUDA
-
5.1
Shader Model
4.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon R7 250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
2
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 970
3
AMD Radeon RX 7600 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
4
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD Radeon R7 265
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1060 5 GB
6
AMD Radeon RX 6800 XT vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z
7
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI All In Wonder HD 3650
8
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD Radeon HD 6350
9
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs AMD Radeon HD 6570 OEM
10
NVIDIA GeForce GTX TITAN Z vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 XTX
Related News
1
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
2
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
3
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
4
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
5
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
6
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
7
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
8
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
9
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
10
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy