Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 vs AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX110 and 8GB VRAM Radeon E9390 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX110 's Advantages
Lower TDP (30W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon E9390 PCIe 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 8% (1089MHz vs 1006MHz)
More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 40.10GB/s)
1536 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX110
0.515 TFLOPS
Radeon E9390 PCIe +657%
3.903 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Nov 2017
Release Date
Oct 2019
GeForce MX(1xx)
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

978 MHz
Base Clock
713 MHz
1006 MHz
Boost Clock
1089 MHz
1253 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
8GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
40.10GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
28
-
-
-
256
Shading Units
1792
16
TMUs
112
8
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
64 KB (per SMM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
1024 KB
L2 Cache
2 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

8.048 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
34.85 GPixel/s
16.10 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
122.0 GTexel/s
-
FP16 (half)
3.903 TFLOPS
515.1 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.903 TFLOPS
16.10 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
243.9 GFLOPS

Board Design

30W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
4x DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GM108S
GPU Name
Ellesmere
N16V-GMR1-S-A2
GPU Variant
-
Maxwell
Architecture
GCN 4.0
TSMC
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
28 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.02 billion
Transistors
5.7 billion
77 mm²
Die Size
232 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (11_0)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
5.0
CUDA
-
6.7 (5.1)
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy