Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Arc A350M

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs Intel Arc A350M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 4GB VRAM Arc A350M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 33% (1532MHz vs 1150MHz)
Intel Arc A350M 's Advantages
Released 4 years and 10 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (112.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Arc A350M +50%
1.766 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Mar 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
1150 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1750 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
112.0GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
768
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
24
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
6
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
27.60 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
55.20 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.533 TFLOPS
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.766 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
441.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
DG2-128
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
25W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy