Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 57% (1532MHz vs 975MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 80W)
AMD Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M290X Mac Edition +69%
1.997 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Nov 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
850 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
975 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
31.20 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
62.40 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.997 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
124.8 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Pitcairn
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Pitcairn PRO (215-0828062)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.8 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
80W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy