Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
224 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150 +390%
1.177 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
160
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Seymour
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy