Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD FirePro W4190M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W4190M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 70% (1532MHz vs 900MHz)
AMD FirePro W4190M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150 +70%
1.177 TFLOPS
FirePro W4190M
0.691 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Nov 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
825 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
900 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.200 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
21.60 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
691.2 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
43.20 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Opal
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
-
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

25W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy