Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 256MB VRAM GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1532MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 256GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 11.23GB/s)
376 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3 's Advantages
Lower TDP (13W vs 25W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150 +5785%
1.177 TFLOPS
GeForce 9200M GS GDDR3
0.02 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Jun 2008
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 9M(9000M)
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
702 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
256MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
11.23GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
3
SM Count
1
384
Shading Units
8
24
TMUs
4
16
ROPs
4
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.116 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.116 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
20.80 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

25W
TDP
13W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
G98
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
G98-700-U2
Pascal
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.21 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
80 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
1.1
6.4
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy