Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon E9171 MCM

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9171 MCM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 26% (1532MHz vs 1219MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 40W)
AMD Radeon E9171 MCM 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Radeon E9171 MCM +6%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
40W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Lexa
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Lexa MCM Pro
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy