Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 16 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 29% (1532MHz vs 1190MHz)
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 16 's Advantages
Released 1 years and 6 months late
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (307.2GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
640 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 16 +107%
2.437 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
Nov 2018
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
815 MHz
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
1190 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1200 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
1024bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
307.2GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
16
384
Shading Units
1024
24
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
1024 KB

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
38.08 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
76.16 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
4.874 TFLOPS
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.437 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
152.3 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Vega 12
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Vega 12 XLA
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
Unknown
74 mm²
Die Size
Unknown

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy