Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 vs AMD Radeon R9 M390X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX150 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M390X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX150 's Advantages
Released 2 years late
Boost Clock1532MHz
Lower TDP (25W vs 75W)
AMD Radeon R9 M390X 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (160.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX150
1.177 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M390X +151%
2.961 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2017
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1469 MHz
Base Clock
-
1532 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1250 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
160.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
2048
24
TMUs
128
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

24.51 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
23.14 GPixel/s
36.77 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
92.54 GTexel/s
18.38 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
2.961 TFLOPS
1177 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
2.961 TFLOPS
36.77 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
185.1 GFLOPS

Board Design

25W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Amethyst
GP108-650-A1 (N17S-G1-A1)
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy