NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs Intel Arc A770M
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 16GB VRAM Arc A770M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 120W)
Intel Arc A770M 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 59% (1650MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Arc A770M
+1596%
13.52 TFLOPS
3DMark Time Spy
GeForce MX250
1079
Arc A770M
+886%
10649
3DMark Time Spy Extreme
GeForce MX250
222
Arc A770M
+2187%
5078
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Arc A770M
+2280%
1714
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jan 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
300 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1650 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s
Render Config
-
-
-
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
128
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
32
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
16 MB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
211.2 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
422.4 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
27.03 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
13.52 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
120W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
DG2-512
-
GPU Variant
ACM-G10
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
21.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
406 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6
