Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro W4150M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro W4150M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro W4150M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 22% (1038MHz vs 850MHz)
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
AMD FirePro W4150M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +22%
0.797 TFLOPS
FirePro W4150M
0.652 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
800 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
850 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
384
24
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.800 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
20.40 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
652.8 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Mars
-
-
-
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy