Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro W5170M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro W5170M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM FirePro W5170M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1038MHz vs 925MHz)
AMD FirePro W5170M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
FirePro W5170M +48%
1.184 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Aug 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-A (3.0)

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
10
384
Shading Units
640
24
TMUs
40
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
37.00 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1184 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
74.00 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy