Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 800M

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 800M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM GeForce 800M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
336 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 15W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +461%
0.797 TFLOPS
GeForce 800M
0.142 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 800M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

3
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
384
Shading Units
48
24
TMUs
8
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.476 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
5.904 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
141.7 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
11.81 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
GF117
-
GPU Variant
N14M-GL
Pascal
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.585 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
116 mm²

Board Design

10W
TDP
15W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
2.1
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy