NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q

VS

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages

Lower TDP (10W vs 80W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1095MHz vs 1038MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

2560 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce MX250

0.797 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q +708%

6.447 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce MX250

1071

GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q +639%

7925

Blender

GeForce MX250

72

GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q +2588%

1936

OctaneBench

GeForce MX250

22

GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q +795%

197

GeForce MX250

VS

GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q

Graphics Card

Unknown

Release Date

Jan 2019

GeForce MX

Generation

GeForce 20 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz

Base Clock

735 MHz

1038 MHz

Boost Clock

1095 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

1500 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

256bit

48.06GB/s

Bandwidth

384.0GB/s

Render Config

3

SM Count

46

-

Compute Units

-

384

Shading Units

2944

24

TMUs

184

16

ROPs

64

-

Tensor Cores

368

-

RT Cores

46

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

64 KB (per SM)

512 KB

L2 Cache

4 MB

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

70.08 GPixel/s

24.91 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

201.5 GTexel/s

12.46 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

12.89 TFLOPS

797.2 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

6.447 TFLOPS

24.91 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

201.5 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP108B

GPU Name

TU104

-

GPU Variant

N18E-G3-A1

Pascal

Architecture

Turing

Samsung

Foundry

TSMC

14 nm

Process Size

12 nm

1.8 billion

Transistors

13.6 billion

74 mm²

Die Size

545 mm²

Board Design

10W

TDP

80W

-

Suggested PSU

-

No outputs

Outputs

No outputs

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

6.1

CUDA

7.5

6.4

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1050 Max Q

2

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 5570

3

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 920A

4

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX150

5

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX130

6

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 940MX

7

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce 610M

8

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 820M

9

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 48

10

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M6100

Related News

1

Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage

2

Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation

3

Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales

4

Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It

5

New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months

6

Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD

7

New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower

8

X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W

9

First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD

10

NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance