NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Radeon E4690 MXM
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 512MB VRAM Radeon E4690 MXM to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 512GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 22.40GB/s)
64 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (10W vs 30W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
+107%
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon E4690 MXM
0.384 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
Jun 2009
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-II
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
700 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
22.40GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
4
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
320
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
384.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Board Design
10W
TDP
30W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
RV730
-
GPU Variant
RV730 XT E4690
(215-0729055)
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
55 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.514 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
146 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
10.1 (10_1)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
4.1
