Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 16GB VRAM Radeon Pro Vega 64X to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Lower TDP (10W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon Pro Vega 64X 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 41% (1468MHz vs 1038MHz)
More VRAM (16GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (512.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
3712 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +1409%
12.03 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX250
72
Radeon Pro Vega 64X +763%
622
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2019
GeForce MX
Generation
Radeon Pro Mac
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1250 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1468 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
16GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
HBM2
64bit
Memory Bus
2048bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
512.0GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
64
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
4096
24
TMUs
256
16
ROPs
64
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
93.95 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
375.8 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
24.05 TFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
12.03 TFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
751.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Vega 10
-
GPU Variant
Vega 10 XT (215-0894200)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 5.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
12.5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
495 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy