Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M5800

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro M5800

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M5800 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock1038MHz
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
Lower TDP (10W vs 26W)
AMD FirePro M5800 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (51.20GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
16 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250 +53%
0.797 TFLOPS
FirePro M5800
0.52 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Mar 2010
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobility
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
-
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
51.20GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
5
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
400
24
TMUs
20
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.200 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
13.00 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
520.0 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
26W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Madison
-
GPU Variant
Madison XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
0.627 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
104 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy