NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R9 M360
We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M360 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 12% (1038MHz vs 925MHz)
AMD Radeon R9 M360 's Advantages
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (72.00GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M360
+18%
0.947 TFLOPS
Graphics Card
Unknown
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce MX
Generation
Gem System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
937 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
925 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1125 MHz
Memory
2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
72.00GB/s
Render Config
-
Compute Units
8
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-
Theoretical Performance
16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
14.80 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
29.60 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
947.2 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
59.20 GFLOPS
Board Design
10W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-
Graphics Processor
GP108B
GPU Name
Tropo
-
GPU Variant
Tropo LE
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.5 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
123 mm²
Graphics Features
12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)
