Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 2GB VRAM Radeon E9173 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (48.06GB/s vs 48.00GB/s)
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)
AMD Radeon E9173 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 17% (1219MHz vs 1038MHz)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
Radeon E9173 PCIe +56%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Unknown
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

937 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
1038 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1502 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
48.06GB/s
Bandwidth
48.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
8
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
512
24
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
24.91 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
12.46 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
797.2 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
24.91 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W
TDP
35W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
1x DisplayPort 1.4a 2x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108B
GPU Name
Lexa
-
GPU Variant
E9170
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy