NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

VS

NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 and 8GB VRAM RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages

Lower TDP (10W vs 50W)

NVIDIA RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 94% (2010MHz vs 1038MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 2GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (256.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)

2688 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce MX250

0.797 TFLOPS

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation +1449%

12.35 TFLOPS

GeForce MX250

VS

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation

Graphics Card

Unknown

Release Date

Mar 2023

GeForce MX

Generation

Quadro Ada-M

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x4

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

937 MHz

Base Clock

1530 MHz

1038 MHz

Boost Clock

2010 MHz

1502 MHz

Memory Clock

2000 MHz

Memory

2GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR5

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

128bit

48.06GB/s

Bandwidth

256.0GB/s

Render Config

-

3

SM Count

24

384

Shading Units

3072

24

TMUs

96

16

ROPs

48

-

Tensor Cores

96

-

RT Cores

24

48 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

512 KB

L2 Cache

12 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

16.61 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

96.48 GPixel/s

24.91 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

193.0 GTexel/s

12.46 GFLOPS

FP16 (half)

12.35 TFLOPS

797.2 GFLOPS

FP32 (float)

12.35 TFLOPS

24.91 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

193.0 GFLOPS

Board Design

10W

TDP

50W

-

No outputs

Outputs

Portable Device Dependent

None

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

GP108B

GPU Name

AD107

-

Pascal

Architecture

Ada Lovelace

Samsung

Foundry

TSMC

14 nm

Process Size

5 nm

1.8 billion

Transistors

18.9 billion

74 mm²

Die Size

159 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

6.1

CUDA

8.9

6.4

Shader Model

6.7

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon HD 7550M

2

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon Pro 450

3

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD FirePro W4130M

4

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Radeon E2400

5

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 775M Mac Edition

6

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs ATI Mobility Radeon HD 3850 X2

7

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce MX570 A

8

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 750M

9

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs AMD Radeon R9 M385X

10

NVIDIA GeForce MX250 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Related News

1

NVIDIA Allegedly Equips RTX 5080 with 30Gbps Memory Speed, Other Models to Feature 28Gbps

2

Intel Reports High Return Rates for Devices Featuring Snapdragon X Series; Qualcomm Counters with 'Industry Standard' Claim

3

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

4

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

5

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

6

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

7

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

8

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

9

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

10

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game