Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD FirePro M8900

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 vs AMD FirePro M8900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX330 and 2GB VRAM FirePro M8900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX330 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 10 months late
Boost Clock1594MHz
Lower TDP (10W vs 75W)
AMD FirePro M8900 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (115.2GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
576 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX330
1.224 TFLOPS
FirePro M8900 +6%
1.306 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Apr 2011
GeForce MX
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1531 MHz
Base Clock
-
1594 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
115.2GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
12
3
SM Count
-
384
Shading Units
960
24
TMUs
48
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

25.50 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
21.76 GPixel/s
38.26 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
32.64 GTexel/s
19.13 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1224 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1306 GFLOPS
38.26 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

10W
TDP
75W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP108
GPU Name
Blackcomb
GP108-655-A1 (N17S-G3-A1)
GPU Variant
Blackcomb XT GL
Pascal
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
40 nm
1.8 billion
Transistors
1.7 billion
74 mm²
Die Size
212 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy