Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs Intel Arc Pro A30M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 4GB VRAM Arc Pro A30M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
Intel Arc Pro A30M 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 6 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 113% (2000MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (128.0GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
384 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Arc Pro A30M +241%
4.096 TFLOPS
Blender
GeForce MX350
122
Arc Pro A30M +209%
378
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Aug 2022
GeForce MX
Generation
Alchemist
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 4.0 x8

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
1500 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
2000 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
2000 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR6
64bit
Memory Bus
64bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
128.0GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
1024
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
32
-
-
-
-
RT Cores
8
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
512 KB
L2 Cache
4 MB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
64.00 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
128.0 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
8.192 TFLOPS
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
4.096 TFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
1024 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
DG2-128
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
ACM-G11
Pascal
Architecture
Generation 12.7
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
6 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
7.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
157 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 Ultimate (12_2)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy