Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 2GB VRAM GeForce GTX 760M to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 43% (937MHz vs 657MHz)
Lower TDP (20W vs 55W)
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760M 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (64.13GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)
128 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +18%
1.199 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 760M
1.009 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
May 2013
GeForce MX
Generation
GeForce 700M
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
628 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
657 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1002 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
64.13GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
768
32
TMUs
64
16
ROPs
16
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per SMX)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
10.51 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
42.05 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1009 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
42.05 GFLOPS

Board Design

20W
TDP
55W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
GK106
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
N14E-GL-A1
Pascal
Architecture
Kepler
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
2.54 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
221 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.1
6.1
CUDA
3.0
6.4
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy