Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 4GB VRAM Radeon E9175 PCIe to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 2 years and 4 months late
128 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (20W vs 50W)
AMD Radeon E9175 PCIe 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 30% (1219MHz vs 937MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (96.00GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350
1.199 TFLOPS
Radeon E9175 PCIe +4%
1.248 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Oct 2017
GeForce MX
Generation
Embedded
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
1124 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
1219 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
640
Shading Units
512
32
TMUs
32
16
ROPs
16
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.50 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
39.01 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
1248 GFLOPS
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1248 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
78.02 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Lexa
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
E9170
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 4.0
Samsung
Foundry
GlobalFoundries
14 nm
Process Size
14 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
2.2 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
103 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
50W
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
5x mini-DisplayPort 1.4a
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy