Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon R7 A260

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 1024MB VRAM Radeon R7 A260 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
More VRAM (2GB vs 1024GB)
256 additional rendering cores
AMD Radeon R7 A260 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (980MHz vs 937MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (57.60GB/s vs 56.06GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +59%
1.199 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A260
0.752 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
900 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
980 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR5
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
57.60GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
5
SM Count
-
640
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
-
-
-
-
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
7.840 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
23.52 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
752.6 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

20W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Topaz
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
Topaz XT (216-0858020)
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
1.55 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
125 mm²

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy