Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 vs AMD Radeon R7 A265

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 2GB VRAM GeForce MX350 and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 A265 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce MX350 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 1 months late
Boost Clock has increased by 14% (937MHz vs 825MHz)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (56.06GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
256 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce MX350 +89%
1.199 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 A265
0.633 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2020
Release Date
Jan 2014
GeForce MX
Generation
All-In-One
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x4
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

747 MHz
Base Clock
725 MHz
937 MHz
Boost Clock
825 MHz
1752 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

2GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR5
Memory Type
DDR3
64bit
Memory Bus
128bit
56.06GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s

Render Config

5
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
640
Shading Units
384
32
TMUs
24
16
ROPs
8
-
Tensor Cores
-
-
RT Cores
-
48 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
512 KB
L2 Cache
256 KB

Theoretical Performance

14.99 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
6.600 GPixel/s
29.98 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.80 GTexel/s
18.74 GFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
1199 GFLOPS
FP32 (float)
633.6 GFLOPS
37.48 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
39.60 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

GP107
GPU Name
Opal
GP107-670-A1 (N17S-G5-A1)
GPU Variant
Opal XT
Pascal
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
14 nm
Process Size
28 nm
3.3 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
132 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Board Design

20W
TDP
Unknown
-
Suggested PSU
-
No outputs
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 (12_1)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
6.1
CUDA
-
6.4
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy