NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

VS

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages

Released 11 months late

Lower TDP (45W vs 115W)

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile 's Advantages

Boost Clock has increased by 6% (1560MHz vs 1477MHz)

More VRAM (8GB vs 4GB)

Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

3072 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

6.05 TFLOPS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile +163%

15.97 TFLOPS

3DMark Time Spy

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

3919

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile +166%

10456

Blender

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

849

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile +290%

3317

OctaneBench

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

64

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile +459%

358

GTA 5 2160p

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

38

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile +105%

78

GTA 5 1440p

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

38

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile +121%

84

GTA 5 1080p

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

90

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile +73%

156

GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile

VS

GeForce RTX 3070 Mobile

Graphics Card

Dec 2021

Release Date

Jan 2021

GeForce 20 Mobile

Generation

GeForce 30 Mobile

Mobile

Type

Mobile

PCIe 3.0 x8

Bus Interface

PCIe 4.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz

Base Clock

1110 MHz

1477 MHz

Boost Clock

1560 MHz

1750 MHz

Memory Clock

1750 MHz

Memory

4GB

Memory Size

8GB

GDDR6

Memory Type

GDDR6

64bit

Memory Bus

256bit

112.0GB/s

Bandwidth

448.0GB/s

Render Config

-

16

SM Count

40

2048

Shading Units

5120

64

TMUs

160

32

ROPs

80

64

Tensor Cores

160

32

RT Cores

40

64 KB (per SM)

L1 Cache

128 KB (per SM)

2 MB

L2 Cache

4 MB

-

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s

Pixel Rate

124.8 GPixel/s

94.53 GTexel/s

Texture Rate

249.6 GTexel/s

12.10 TFLOPS

FP16 (half)

15.97 TFLOPS

6.050 TFLOPS

FP32 (float)

15.97 TFLOPS

189.1 GFLOPS

FP64 (double)

249.6 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W

TDP

115W

-

1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a

Outputs

No outputs

1x 6-pin

Power Connectors

None

Graphics Processor

GA107

GPU Name

GA104

-

GPU Variant

GA104-770-A1

Ampere

Architecture

Ampere

Samsung

Foundry

Samsung

8 nm

Process Size

8 nm

Unknown

Transistors

17.4 billion

Unknown

Die Size

392 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)

DirectX

12 Ultimate (12_2)

4.6

OpenGL

4.6

3.0

OpenCL

3.0

1.3

Vulkan

1.3

8.6

CUDA

8.6

6.6

Shader Model

6.6

Related GPU Comparisons

1

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon RX 7600S

2

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 8750M

3

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 280M

4

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 6610M

5

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro M8900

6

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 130M

7

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD FirePro W5170M

8

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon Pro WX 3200 Mobile

9

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon HD 7550M

10

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 850M

Related News

1

Intel Confirms Panther Lake Adopts 18A Process, ES0 Samples Already Sent to Customers

2

Complete Lineup of Core Ultra 200HX/H/U and Core 200H/U Revealed: 31 Models to Dazzle the Eyes

3

Amechi Unveils V1 Mini PC: Only 0.33L Volume with 150W Power Consumption

4

iPhone 17 Series Set for Major Design Overhaul: Camera Module Transformed into Sleek Strip

5

The Thinnest iPhone Ever! iPhone 17 Air Reportedly Enters Foxconn's NPI Stage

6

Apple Allegedly Cancels M4 Extreme, Originally Planned for Mac Pro with 64-Core CPU and 160-Core GPU

7

Cyberpunk 2077 Update 2.2: Intel Arrow Lake Gaming Performance Soars by 33%!

8

Intel Finally Achieves Frame Generation! 'F1 24' Becomes the First XeSS 2 Game

9

World's First! Intel Arc B580 Graphics Card Arrives Early

10

Linux Creator Criticizes AMD and Intel's x86 Microarchitecture: A Complete Disaster