Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile vs AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile and 4GB VRAM Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile 's Advantages
Released 6 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1477MHz
Lower TDP (45W vs 250W)
AMD Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition 's Advantages
Larger VRAM bandwidth (174.7GB/s vs 112.0GB/s)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2050 Mobile +62%
6.05 TFLOPS
Radeon R9 M395X Mac Edition
3.723 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Dec 2021
Release Date
May 2015
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
Crystal System
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x8
Bus Interface
MXM-B (3.0)

Clock Speeds

1185 MHz
Base Clock
-
1477 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1365 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
4GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
64bit
Memory Bus
256bit
112.0GB/s
Bandwidth
174.7GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
32
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
2048
64
TMUs
128
32
ROPs
32
64
Tensor Cores
-
32
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.26 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
29.09 GPixel/s
94.53 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
116.4 GTexel/s
12.10 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
3.723 TFLOPS
6.050 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
3.723 TFLOPS
189.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
232.7 GFLOPS

Board Design

45W
TDP
250W
-
-
-
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.1 2x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
No outputs
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Amethyst
-
GPU Variant
Amethyst XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 3.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
Unknown
Transistors
5 billion
Unknown
Die Size
366 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
6.3

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy