Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 9 months late
Boost Clock1530MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (448.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2016 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 175W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 SUPER Mobile +2674%
6.659 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2019
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1470 MHz
Base Clock
-
1530 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
448.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
34
SM Count
-
2176
Shading Units
160
136
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
272
Tensor Cores
-
34
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

97.92 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
208.1 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
13.32 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.659 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
208.1 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

175W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
-
-
-

Graphics Processor

TU106
GPU Name
Seymour
TU106-410-A1
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
10.8 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
445 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy