Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs AMD FirePro V5900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs AMD FirePro V5900

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 and 2GB VRAM FirePro V5900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 64.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro V5900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (75W vs 160W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 +950%
6.451 TFLOPS
FirePro V5900
0.614 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2020
Release Date
May 2011
GeForce 20
Generation
FirePro
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
192bit
Memory Bus
256bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
64.00GB/s

Render Config

30
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
8
1920
Shading Units
512
120
TMUs
32
48
ROPs
32
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
3 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB

Theoretical Performance

80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
19.20 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
19.20 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
614.4 GFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
153.6 GFLOPS

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Cayman
TU104-150-KC-A1
GPU Variant
Cayman LE WS
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 3
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
2.64 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
389 mm²

Board Design

160W
TDP
75W
450 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
1x DVI
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy