CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs NVIDIA NVS 310
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
NVIDIA NVS 310
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 and 512MB VRAM NVS 310 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 's Advantages
Released 7 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1680MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (336.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
1872 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 310 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 160W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
+6351%
6.451 TFLOPS
NVS 310
0.1 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
VS
NVS 310
Graphics Card
Jan 2020
Release Date
Jun 2012
GeForce 20
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1365 MHz
Base Clock
-
1680 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
192bit
Memory Bus
64bit
336.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s
Render Config
30
SM Count
1
-
Compute Units
-
1920
Shading Units
48
120
TMUs
8
48
ROPs
4
240
Tensor Cores
-
30
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
3 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
Theoretical Performance
80.64 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
201.6 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
12.90 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.451 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
201.6 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
TU104
GPU Name
GF119
TU104-150-KC-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Turing
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²
Board Design
160W
TDP
20W
450 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x DVI 1x HDMI 2.0 2x DisplayPort 1.4a 1x USB Type-C
Outputs
2x DisplayPort
1x 8-pin
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
2.1
6.6
Shader Model
5.1
Related GPU Comparisons
1
NVIDIA GeForce 8400 GS Rev. 3 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
2
NVIDIA Quadro M2000M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
3
NVIDIA Quadro P620 Mobile vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 760 OEM Rebrand
5
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
6
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
7
AMD Radeon 680M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs NVIDIA RTX 5880 Ada Generation
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs AMD Radeon Pro 5700 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2060 TU104 vs NVIDIA GeForce GTS 450 Rev. 2
Related News
1
Snapdragon 8 Gen 4 to Feature Frame Interpolation for GPU: A Game-Changing Experience
2
Intel Adds 5 New Device IDs to Latest Linux Xe Kernel in Preparation for Battlemage
3
Ryzen AI 9 365 Benchmark Results Leaked: Significant Improvements in Multi-Core and IPC Performance Over Previous Generation
4
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
5
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
6
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
7
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
8
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
9
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
10
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy