Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 8GB VRAM GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 3 months late
Boost Clock1095MHz
More VRAM (8GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (384.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2784 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 80W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 2080 Max Q +2586%
6.447 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2019
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 20 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 3.0 x16
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1095 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

8GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
256bit
Memory Bus
64bit
384.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
46
SM Count
-
2944
Shading Units
160
184
TMUs
8
64
ROPs
4
368
Tensor Cores
-
46
RT Cores
-
64 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
4 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

70.08 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
201.5 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
12.89 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.447 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
201.5 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

80W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
No outputs
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

TU104
GPU Name
Seymour
N18E-G3-A1
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Turing
Architecture
TeraScale 2
TSMC
Foundry
TSMC
12 nm
Process Size
40 nm
13.6 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
545 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
7.5
CUDA
-
6.6
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy