Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB vs ATI FireMV 2400 PCI

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB and 128MB VRAM FireMV 2400 PCI to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 14 years late
Boost Clock1740MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 128GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (192.0GB/s vs 16.00GB/s)
2048 additional rendering cores
ATI FireMV 2400 PCI 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 90W)

Score

VS

Graphics Card

Jan 2022
Release Date
Jan 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
FireMV Multi-View
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCI

Clock Speeds

1545 MHz
Base Clock
-
1740 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
500 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
128MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
192.0GB/s
Bandwidth
16.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
-
64
TMUs
4
32
ROPs
4
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

55.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
2.000 GPixel/s
111.4 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
2.000 GTexel/s
7.127 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
7.127 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
-
111.4 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

90W
TDP
20W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x VHDCI
1x 6-pin
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
RV380
GA107-140-A1
GPU Variant
-
Ampere
Architecture
Rage 9
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
130 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.075 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
92 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
9.0
4.6
OpenGL
2.0
3.0
OpenCL
N/A
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
-

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy