CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 512MB VRAM GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 28.80GB/s)
2272 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2 's Advantages
Lower TDP (50W vs 70W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+6956%
6.774 TFLOPS
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
0.096 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
VS
GeForce 9500 GT Rev. 2
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jul 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 9
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
512MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
28.80GB/s
Render Config
18
SM Count
4
-
Compute Units
-
2304
Shading Units
32
72
TMUs
16
32
ROPs
8
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
32 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.800 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
9.600 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
96.00 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
G96B
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
G96-309-B1
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla
Samsung
Foundry
UMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.314 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
144 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
50W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
None
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.1
6.7
Shader Model
4.0
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
6
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GT 120 Mac Edition
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon X1950 PRO DUAL
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 315
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy