Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 315

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA NVS 315

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 1024MB VRAM NVS 315 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 11 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 14.00GB/s)
2256 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA NVS 315 's Advantages
Lower TDP (19W vs 70W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +6674%
6.774 TFLOPS
NVS 315
0.1 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Mar 2013
GeForce 30
Generation
NVS
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
875 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.00GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
1
2304
Shading Units
48
72
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
64 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
1.046 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
4.184 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
100.4 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
8.368 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
19W
250 W
Suggested PSU
200 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
1x DMS-59
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GF119
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
GF119-825-A1
Ampere
Architecture
Fermi 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.292 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
79 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
2.1
6.7
Shader Model
5.1

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy