Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce GTX 260 Core 216

We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 896MB VRAM GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 15 years and 5 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 896GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 111.9GB/s)
2088 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 182W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB +1163%
6.774 TFLOPS
GeForce GTX 260 Core 216
0.536 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Feb 2024
Release Date
Sep 2008
GeForce 30
Generation
GeForce 200
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
999 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
896MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
96bit
Memory Bus
448bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
111.9GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
18
SM Count
27
2304
Shading Units
216
72
TMUs
72
32
ROPs
28
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
224 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.13 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
41.47 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
536.5 GFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
67.07 GFLOPS

Board Design

70W
TDP
182W
250 W
Suggested PSU
450 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x S-Video
None
Power Connectors
2x 6-pin

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GT200
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
G200-103-A2
Ampere
Architecture
Tesla 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
65 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.4 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
576 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.1 (10_0)
4.6
OpenGL
3.3
3.0
OpenCL
1.1
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
1.3
6.7
Shader Model
4.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy