CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
Rankings
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
English
English
Close menu
Home
CPU
GPU
SoC
Categories
CPU Rankings
GPU Rankings
SoC Rankings
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
中文
English
Español
Deutsch
Français
Italiano
Português
日本語
한국어
العربية
ภาษาไทย
繁體中文
Tiếng Việt
Bahasa Melayu
Home
GPU Comparison
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
VS
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
AMD Radeon R7 360 896SP
We compared two Desktop platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB and 2GB VRAM Radeon R7 360 896SP to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.
Main Differences
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB 's Advantages
Released 8 years and 8 months late
Boost Clock1470MHz
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (168.0GB/s vs 96.00GB/s)
1408 additional rendering cores
Lower TDP (70W vs 85W)
Score
Benchmark
FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
+243%
6.774 TFLOPS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
1.971 TFLOPS
GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
VS
Radeon R7 360 896SP
Graphics Card
Feb 2024
Release Date
Jun 2015
GeForce 30
Generation
Pirate Islands
Desktop
Type
Desktop
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x16
Clock Speeds
1042 MHz
Base Clock
-
1470 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1750 MHz
Memory Clock
1500 MHz
Memory
6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
128bit
168.0GB/s
Bandwidth
96.00GB/s
Render Config
18
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
14
2304
Shading Units
896
72
TMUs
56
32
ROPs
16
72
Tensor Cores
-
18
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
Theoretical Performance
47.04 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
17.60 GPixel/s
105.8 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
61.60 GTexel/s
6.774 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
6.774 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
1.971 TFLOPS
105.8 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
123.2 GFLOPS
Graphics Processor
GA107
GPU Name
Tobago
GA107-325-K2-A1
GPU Variant
Tobago XT
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 2.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
2.08 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
160 mm²
Board Design
70W
TDP
85W
250 W
Suggested PSU
250 W
1x HDMI 2.1 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
Outputs
2x DVI 1x HDMI 1.4a 1x DisplayPort 1.2
None
Power Connectors
1x 6-pin
Graphics Features
12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.2
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.3
Related GPU Comparisons
1
AMD Radeon 780M vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
2
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4050 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
3
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1660 SUPER vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
4
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4060
5
NVIDIA GeForce GTX 1650 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
6
AMD Radeon RX 6600 vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB
7
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI Radeon HD 2900 GT
8
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce RTX 4070 AD103
9
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs AMD Radeon RX 6700 XT
10
NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 6 GB vs ATI FirePro V3800
Related News
1
Concerns Raised by Unstable 13th/14th Gen Core CPUs: Motherboard Manufacturers Worry About Impact on Arrow Lake Release and Sales
2
Do You Really Know What a "Rendering Engine" Is? Read This Article to Understand All About It
3
New AMD Zen5 Ryzen 9000 Motherboards X870E/X870 to Adopt USB4! But You’ll Have to Wait Two More Months
4
Surpassing RTX 2050! Intel's Next-Gen Integrated Graphics Benchmark Closely Approaches AMD
5
New Benchmarks for AMD Ryzen AI 9 HX 370 Revealed: Single-Core Parity with R9 7945HX3D, Multi-Core Still Lower
6
X3D Performance Beyond Words! AMD Ryzen 7 9700X May Unlock Power Consumption: From 65W to 120W
7
First Benchmark Leak of Intel Core Ultra 7 268V: Single-Core Performance Soars by 20%, Still Lags Behind AMD
8
NVIDIA Grace CPU Benchmark Results Released, Stunning Performance
9
Minisforum Launches UM890 Pro Mini PC with R9 8945HS and Dual USB4 Ports
10
Does the Apple A18 Neural Engine Boast Superior Performance? Computational Power May Surpass M4 Chip
© 2024 - TopCPU.net
Contact Us
Privacy Policy