Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB vs AMD FirePro M2000

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB vs AMD FirePro M2000

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M2000 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Released 10 years late
Boost Clock1125MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 25.60GB/s)
1568 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M2000 's Advantages
Lower TDP (33W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB +860%
4.608 TFLOPS
FirePro M2000
0.48 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Jul 2012
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

757 MHz
Base Clock
-
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
800 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
25.60GB/s

Render Config

16
SM Count
-
-
Compute Units
6
2048
Shading Units
480
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
-
2 MB
L2 Cache
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
4.000 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
12.00 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.608 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
480.0 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Turks
-
GPU Variant
Turks GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.716 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
118 mm²

Board Design

35W
TDP
33W
-
Suggested PSU
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy