Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB vs AMD FirePro M3100

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB vs AMD FirePro M3100

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3100 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 4 GB 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 61% (1125MHz vs 700MHz)
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 32.00GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 4 GB +758%
4.608 TFLOPS
FirePro M3100
0.537 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x8

Clock Speeds

757 MHz
Base Clock
650 MHz
1125 MHz
Boost Clock
700 MHz
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
1000 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
DDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
128bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
32.00GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
6
16
SM Count
-
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
8
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
16 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
256 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

36.00 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
5.600 GPixel/s
72.00 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
16.80 GTexel/s
4.608 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
4.608 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
537.6 GFLOPS
72.00 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

35W
TDP
Unknown
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
Portable Device Dependent
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Mars
-
GPU Variant
Mars M2 LP (216-0842009)
Ampere
Architecture
GCN 1.0
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
28 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.95 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
77 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (11_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
2.1 (1.2)
1.3
Vulkan
1.2.170
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
6.5 (5.1)

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy