Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB vs NVIDIA GeForce MX250

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 6GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 6 GB and 2GB VRAM GeForce MX250 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Max-Q Refresh 6 GB 's Advantages
More VRAM (6GB vs 2GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (144.0GB/s vs 48.06GB/s)
1664 additional rendering cores
NVIDIA GeForce MX250 's Advantages
Boost Clock has increased by 5% (1038MHz vs 990MHz)
Lower TDP (10W vs 35W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Max Q Refresh 6 GB +408%
4.055 TFLOPS
GeForce MX250
0.797 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

Jul 2022
Release Date
Unknown
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
GeForce MX
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 3.0 x4

Clock Speeds

622 MHz
Base Clock
937 MHz
990 MHz
Boost Clock
1038 MHz
1500 MHz
Memory Clock
1502 MHz

Memory

6GB
Memory Size
2GB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR5
96bit
Memory Bus
64bit
144.0GB/s
Bandwidth
48.06GB/s

Render Config

-
-
-
16
SM Count
3
2048
Shading Units
384
64
TMUs
24
32
ROPs
16
64
Tensor Cores
-
16
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
48 KB (per SM)
2 MB
L2 Cache
512 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

31.68 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
16.61 GPixel/s
63.36 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
24.91 GTexel/s
4.055 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
12.46 GFLOPS
4.055 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
797.2 GFLOPS
63.36 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
24.91 GFLOPS

Board Design

35W
TDP
10W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
None

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
GP108B
-
-
-
Ampere
Architecture
Pascal
Samsung
Foundry
Samsung
8 nm
Process Size
14 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
1.8 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
74 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
12 (12_1)
4.6
OpenGL
4.6
3.0
OpenCL
3.0
1.3
Vulkan
1.3
8.6
CUDA
6.1
6.7
Shader Model
6.4

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy