Home GPU Comparison NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q vs AMD FirePro M3900

We compared two Mobile platform GPUs: 4GB VRAM GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q and 1024MB VRAM FirePro M3900 to see which GPU has better performance in key specifications, benchmark tests, power consumption, etc.

Main Differences

NVIDIA GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max-Q 's Advantages
Released 10 years and 7 months late
Boost Clock1035MHz
More VRAM (4GB vs 1024GB)
Larger VRAM bandwidth (176.0GB/s vs 14.40GB/s)
2400 additional rendering cores
AMD FirePro M3900 's Advantages
Lower TDP (20W vs 75W)

Score

Benchmark

FP32 (float)
GeForce RTX 3050 Ti Max Q +2107%
5.299 TFLOPS
FirePro M3900
0.24 TFLOPS
VS

Graphics Card

May 2021
Release Date
Oct 2010
GeForce 30 Mobile
Generation
FirePro Mobile
Mobile
Type
Mobile
PCIe 4.0 x8
Bus Interface
PCIe 2.0 x16

Clock Speeds

735 MHz
Base Clock
-
1035 MHz
Boost Clock
-
1375 MHz
Memory Clock
900 MHz

Memory

4GB
Memory Size
1024MB
GDDR6
Memory Type
GDDR3
128bit
Memory Bus
64bit
176.0GB/s
Bandwidth
14.40GB/s

Render Config

-
Compute Units
2
20
SM Count
-
2560
Shading Units
160
80
TMUs
8
32
ROPs
4
80
Tensor Cores
-
20
RT Cores
-
128 KB (per SM)
L1 Cache
8 KB (per CU)
2 MB
L2 Cache
128 KB
-
-
-

Theoretical Performance

33.12 GPixel/s
Pixel Rate
3.000 GPixel/s
82.80 GTexel/s
Texture Rate
6.000 GTexel/s
5.299 TFLOPS
FP16 (half)
-
5.299 TFLOPS
FP32 (float)
240.0 GFLOPS
82.80 GFLOPS
FP64 (double)
-

Board Design

75W
TDP
20W
-
-
-
Portable Device Dependent
Outputs
No outputs
None
Power Connectors
-

Graphics Processor

GA107
GPU Name
Seymour
-
GPU Variant
Seymour GL
Ampere
Architecture
TeraScale 2
Samsung
Foundry
TSMC
8 nm
Process Size
40 nm
8.7 billion
Transistors
0.37 billion
200 mm²
Die Size
67 mm²

Graphics Features

12 Ultimate (12_2)
DirectX
11.2 (11_0)
4.6
OpenGL
4.4
3.0
OpenCL
1.2
1.3
Vulkan
N/A
8.6
CUDA
-
6.7
Shader Model
5.0

Related GPU Comparisons

Related News

© 2024 - TopCPU.net   Contact Us Privacy Policy